Shopping Mall




Meta Search Engine
Baby Books Camera & Photo Classical Music Computer & Video Games Computers DVD Electronics
Kitchen & Housewares Software Magazines Tools & Hardware Outdoor Living Popular Music Toys & Games Videos

Fine Art Prints

Best Sellers Art Prints

Sale Art Prints

Limited Edition Art Prints


Buy Modern Art Prints, Fine Art Prints, Framed Art Prints and Art Prints Posters.

Select the first letter of the artist's last name to search the Fine Art Prints: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Americana Art Prints Fashion Art Prints Motivational Art Prints Spiritual Art Prints
Animals Art Prints Floral Art Prints Music Art Prints Sports Art Prints
Architecture Art Prints Holiday Art Prints Nature Art Prints Still Life Art Prints
Cityscapes Art Prints Humorous Art Prints People Art Prints Transportation Art Prints
Cuisine Art Prints Kids Club Art Prints Romantic Art Prints Vintage Art Prints
Dance Art Prints Landscape Art Prints Seasons Art Prints World Culture Art Prints
Fantasy Art Prints Maps Art Prints Ships & Shore Art Prints  

The Impressionists






'In a new age, new techniques. It's a simple matter of good sense', commented the young French writer and critic J. K. Huysmans (1848-1907) extremely perceptively on the innovatory Impressionist group in 1879. However, it had taken almost a century of social, political and artistic upheaval, and of struggle against the extreme stranglehold of the French Academy, for all but a few to recognize this fact. Traditional conventions in French art were deeply ingrained, and the whole established structure of the art world dug in its conservative heels against change, novelty and the needs of the new age. From the French Revolution of 1789 onwards, three generations of young, independent artists were forced to seek their own alternatives in style, training, patronage and painting methods, against the power monopoly invested in the Academy. The rise of Impressionism, with its radical new aims and painting techniques, can only be under-stood against the background which dictated artistic taste, and against which these young artists reacted.

The rise of the Academies
During the Italian Renaissance, artists like Leonardo (1452-1519) and Michelangelo (1475-1564) had struggled to raise the status of the artist from the medieval position of humble artisan. Because painting was felt to soil the hands and involve manual labor, it had not been accorded the status given to such scholarly pursuits as music, mathematics and literature. In order to rectify this, when the first art academies were founded in the sixteenth century, they taught only the most intellectual aspects of art, the scientific study of anatomy, the geometry of perspective for constructing an illusion of space and. most importantly, drawing. Although color is a real presence in nature, line as such does not exist. The outlines, contours and shading used in drawing are technical devices intended as a way of enabling artists to translate the appearance of three-dimensional objects onto a flat surface. Therefore by stressing the superiority of drawing artists were emphasizing the most intellectual and abstract aspect of their work, that element in which the humanizing, rationalizing influence of the human mind could best be seen. Painting, or coloring, was relegated to a secondary role because of its association with the senses and with the vulgar imitation of raw nature, as well as with the dirty, practical side of art. At all costs painting had to be seen to appeal to the higher, moral side of the human mind, not merely to satisfy sensual appetites.

This split between the intellectual and the senses, between line and color, artist and artisan, was perpetuated in seventeenth century France, when the Royal Academy was founded there in the 1640s. The most famous artists of this period, like Nicolas Poussin (c 1594-1665) and Claude (1600-1682), spent most of their lives in Italy, enjoying the privileged status by then accepted as due to the greatest talents. The renowned theorists of the period took up the debate between the mind and the senses, transforming it into the contemporary division between those in favor of the classicizing Poussin, and those behind the flamboyant colorist from Flanders, Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640). The Academy had been founded to improve the status of French artists, to bring art within the control of the absolute monarch Louis XIV, and to free artists from what they con-sidered the retrogressive strangle hold of the traditional guilds. While the guilds,established during the Middle Ages, stressed thorough practical training and craftsmanship, the Academy con-centrated upon drawing, in particular from the human figure which was considered the principal vehicle for embodying and expressing the highest human ideals.

The human form was not simply to be'imitated' in drawing, but to be idealized — inconformity with ancient Greek, Roman and Renaissance art — to represent the purest forms of an ideal of truth and beauty upon which the mind could eflect and thus be elevated.

These attitudes influenced the choice of subject matter which, as a result, fell into a distinct hierarchy according to the degree of spiritual elevation it was felt to display. Lowest on the scale were still life, animal painting, rural landscape and genre or domestic scenes. Historical landscape painting, by which was meant a heroic landscape with a moral or classical theme, together with portrait and religious subjects, were more highly regarded. However, the most highly respected type of painting was history painting, which represented heroic deeds from the history of the Greeks and Romans. Through this type of work, the artist could best show skill in depicting both the nude and draperies. To this end, the Academy encouraged students to familiarize themselves with details of classical history and mythology and to study and copy the works of suitable Old

Paralleling this high ideal, academic artists —unlike their guild counterparts — were from the first forbidden to advertise or hawk their products. Such lowly, mercantile activity was considered beneath the dignity of fine artists.Instead, a regular venue, the Salon, so named after the Salon Carre in the Louvre where the first exhibitions were held, was established as the sole acceptable market place for the work of Academy-trained artists. The power of the Salon grew, and it retained its monopoly as the main outlet for artists' work until the latter part of the nineteenth century.

Teaching under the Academy
By the nineteenth century, the academic training of the artist had become ritualized into a rigid formula, which was self-perpetuating and changed only with great reluctance to meet the new needs of the age. The Academy was renamed the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in the reign of Napoleon I, and it only accepted students who already showed proven ability in drawing.
Drawing instruction at the Ecole was given by members of the Academy, by then an honorary elite body of artists who were elected to life membership by other academicians and who advised the government on all artistic matters. Academicians controlled not only the curriculum at the Ecole, but also the competitions students had to enter and win to achieve success and con-solidate their careers. Academicians were also jurors dictating entry to and medals awarded at the annual Salon exhibitions. The Academy thus effectively dominated art production and was able to perpetuate its conservative style and taste.

Academic control of teaching was not limited to drawing instruction at the Ecole; academicians prepared students for entry into the Ecole with drawing lessons in their private teaching studios or ateliers, where they also instructed advanced students in painting practice. The great ency-clopedia, compiled by the French writer Denis Diderot (1 713-1784) and published in the latter half of the eighteenth century, shows the typical progress of students through the various stages in the hierarchicaldrawing curriculum, which would give them access to the Ecole. The first stage involved copying either drawings or engravings, first in terms only of outline, then with hatched shading. This was known as work 'from the flat'because students had merely to imitate the simple lines to which the form had already been reduced.

Once this was successfully mastered, the student moved on to drawing low-relief sculpture. Here the fall of light and shade on the simple raised forms had to be translated into shading. This shading followed strict conventions and formed an important part of the approach to painting ap-proved by the Academy. It was called chiaroscuro, which means light-dark in Italian. To achieve the subtleties of chiaroscuro shading, series of distinct, hatched parallel marks indicated shaded areas, while the white of the paper was left blank to represent highlights. For this, pencil or graphite, a crisp precise medium, was preferred during the first half of the century. Chalk or charcoal which were softer and more suited to the rubbed blending which was used to create tonal gradations, became the popular media as the system liberalized.

The next step was for students to draw from sculpture in the round. First only parts of, and then complete statues, usually cast after antique examples, had to be translated into delicate patterns of line, built up to recreate on flat paper the illusion of form in space. Because the reliefs and sculptures were cast in white plaster, no color was present to distract the eye; the form present-ed itself simply in monochrome gradations of tone from light to dark. As the models from which the students worked were already idealized works of art, they helped to inculcate in the students a mannered vision of nature, which encouraged them to draw the live model in a conventional, idealized and unindividual way. Thus, by the time students graduated to work from the live figure, their drawing style had already been formed.

Although the real color and anatomical idiosyncracies of the human figure were a shock to the students' unaccustomed eyes, the tendency to see the form only in abstract line and tonal grad-ations was already well in grained. Models were commonly posed in noble stances derived from antique statues, which both aided the transition from cast to live model, and maintained the em-phasis on the classical tradition. Such exercises were designed to give students the competence to tackle complex figure compositions based on classical themes, which would prepare them for the grand Rome Prize, the final competition toward which all their studies were directed.

Only when students were thoroughly proficient in drawing from the live model were they permitted to use color. The master generally gave a brief introduction to the materials and tools of painting and their care, and then the students began copying a painted head. This was either an example specially executed by the master, or, occasionally, students were sent to the Louvre to copy an Old Master head. Venetian or Flemish artists were usually chosen because their lively handling and color were simpler to imitate. Students were then put to work from a live head. before going on toattempt to paint the nude model. The first stage in the painting process was the thinly painted laying in of the lines, broad masses and half- tones of the subject, which provided the base for the finished painting. This stage was called the ebauche. This first layer had to be 'leaner'. in other words contain less oil. than the final reworking, to adhere to the rule 'fat over lean', essential to competent oil painting. This rule is important because, if an oily layer is laid over an even oilier base, the latter will continue drying after the final coat is dry, thus causing the top layer to shrink and crack, exposing the underpainting.

Students were taught to prepare their palette in advance, using mainly earth colors plus Prussian blue, black and lead white. As the nineteenth century progressed, the use of the earth colors, which were relatively stable chemically, gave way to a preference for the impermanent beauties of tarry colors, like bitumen, which destroyed many paintings. Carefully prepared tints, which were thoroughly mixed with a pliant knife on a palette, were arranged in separate rows aligned with the outer edge of a clean palette - lights, darks and intermediary halftones. Once the palette was ready, light charcoal lines were drawn onto the primed canvas to indicate the contours of the form. The canvas was then gently tapped or blown on to remove excess dusty particles of the charcoal, to prevent their muddying the wet oil colors.

Next a dilute red-brown mixture was prepared by adding turpentine to an earth-color mixture, and with this transparent tint the charcoal contours were reworked and strengthened using a fine sable-hair brush. Again with the dilute mixture, called the 'sauce', the main areas of shadow were broadly laid in. normally with a larger, stiffer hog's hair brush, following the guidelines provided by the contours. Backgrounds were generally roughed in as early as possible, to block out the pale priming color which, because of its glaring brilliance, made it difficult for the student to judge the correcttonal values in the picture. Detail.was avoided in this early stage, only the general effects of light and shade were sought.

Then. with thicker paint and usually a stiff brush, the lights — or parts of the painting directly illuminated by the fall of light — were added, but not at full strength. Next came the careful work of building up the delicately gradated halftones between the lights and the darks, to give relief to the form. These were placed side by side in separate, mosaic-like touches of color, which were finally blended until the changes in tone were imperceptible and the brushstrokes no longer visible. After blending the halftones, a few lively, expressive brushstrokes of color were applied to both lights and darks, to help the work retain a feeling of spontaneity.

Once this stage was complete, the work was left to dry thoroughly. The most thinly painted dilute areas of color — the shadows and general background — would dry fairly rapidly due to evaporation of the turpentine spirit. The more thickly applied halftones and highlights could take a week, more usually two, to dry. The ebauche stage was then finished by first scraping down the dry surface, to remove any irregularities which might interfere with the smooth movement of the brush during reworking.Then the mosaic application of halftones was repeated, the highlights brought to full strength and the color of the shadows deepened and enriched.

When painting from the live nude. students had to work rapidly to complete the ebauche. They had also to work in relatively thin paint, or it would not dry in time to be finished in the week allotted to each pose. Many unfinished life paintings survive, indicating how difficult it was to complete a figure study in so short a time. Backgrounds were generally left loose and vague, the greatest care being devoted to working up the precise tonal and color values on the figure itself.

The technical formula most widely recommended for executing the ebauche in the ateliers was to paint the lights thickly, in opaque impasto and, in contrast, to wash in the shadows thinly and transparently. This technique, normally retained for the finishing as well as the ebauche stage, aided the rendering of form in two important ways. First, the subtle transition from balanced light to shadowed areas created a convincing illusion of form in space — a sculpture-like solidity. Secondly, the physical character of the finished surface, with projecting impasted lights and flat shadows, gave a relief-like authenticity to the actual paint surface. The raised, light parts of a picture were intended to pick up and reflect back to the spectator the actual light in the room where the work was hung, thus reinforcing the illusion of light in the picture itself. For this reason artists preferred to hang their work under a light source comparable to that under which it had been executed, preferably with the actual light source falling at the same angle as the painted fall of light so they would not contradict each other.

The art student's life
Students usually started to study at the Ecole between the ages of 15 and 18. Training would last for at least five years. The art student's day began early. In summer the long daylight hours permitted drawing classes in the ateliers to begin as early as 7am. The rapin — the newest student - arrived even earlier to tidy and organize the studio, and in winter to light the stove. Classes in the ateliers lasted only for the morning, finishing usually around noon or 1pm. The atelier masters normally visited their students only once or at most twice each week, to advise and to criticize their work and to set 'homework', such as compositional exercises or copying, to prepare students for Ecole competitions.

The afternoons were spent in the painting and drawing collections of the Louvre, making copies from the Old Masters. This was a crucial element in the Ecole program. Copying was intended to familiarize students with the techniques of the past, and to inspire them to emulate the compo-sitional ideas and devices of the great masters. Students also collected and copied engravings and lithographs after Old Master paintings.

Drawing classes at the Ecole, for those advanced enough to register there, began in the late afternoon, usually at 4pm. Students normally worked from casts or the live model at the Ecole. During the summer months, most students were encouraged to draw and paint from nature, doing outdoor landscape work. A knowledge of landscape was considered essential even for students primarily interested in figure painting, as they needed to be able to paint authentic landscape backdrops to their figure compositions. It was also thought important in training the students' powers of observation.

Constrained by the tightly organized teaching program, students learned to work at speed in order to succeed in the numerous timed drawing and painting competitions around which their studies were structured. Each competition marked a progressively more demanding step on the ladder toward the most coveted award, the Prix deRome. which assured the winner fame after four or five years' study at the French Academy in the Italian capital. Until the early nineteenth century, only one Rome Prize — in history painting — was awarded every year and thus, because of the large numbers of students involved, few students had any real chance of success in this outdated system. Neither consistent application, nor even talent guaranteed advancement. Each master backed a protege, and this often encouraged servile imitation in preference to independent originality on the part of the young artists.

The Academy's authority questioned
Although the overall program of teaching at the Ecole remained little changed from the seven-teenth century until the reforms of 1863, new emphases were apparent in the nineteenth century system. The powerful impact of Jacques Louis David (1748-1825), who headed the classical re-vival and whose influence dominated art training and practice from the 1 790s, led to a greater stress on life drawing and on the use of halftones to create 'sculptural' forms. His famous pupil Ingres (1780-1867) followed him, albeit with somewhat different concerns, as the major influ-ence on French art through his teaching. Since many of the older independent artists, such as Delacroix (1798-1863) and Corot (1796-1875), did not run teaching ateliers, they produced no 'schools' of followers as such.

Another new factor was the marked increase in competitiveness resulting from the rapid growth in numbers of would-be artists from the late eighteenth century onwards. The collaborative studio-workshop training and practice still common in the seventeenth century had disappeared. The new individualism, inspired by the French Revolution of 1789 and the riseof the bourgeoisie, found its parallels in the career structure of artists. Professionalism, reinforced by a rigorous, quantifiable training, gradually gave artists a new middle class respectability and social acceptability.

By the early nineteenth century, certain more liberal changes were essential to the survival of the academic system, confronted as it was with growing dissention and dissatisfaction among independently minded artists. Some recognition of new trends had to be given by the Academy, for social and economic up heaval had created new official state and bourgeois patrons, whose needs and taste were often at variance with academic ideals. In 1816 the Academy introduced an official four yearly Rome Prize in historic landscape painting, to placate the taste of public and artists for this increasingly popular genre, and at the same time to bring it within the Academy's control. However, this fostered only the classical landscape
tradition, and was thus later to force the budding schools of Romantic and Realist landscape painting into open opposition to the Academy. However, in 1863, when most of the Impressionists were students, the Rome Prize for landscape was bolished.

Ironically, some aspects of the academic curriculum itself laid the foundations for the independent stylistic innovations which led to Impressionism and which eventually eroded the Academy's supremacy. The concentrated nature of the academic training ensured that students spent the majority of their time on the freely worked stages of painting - the ebauche of the life model, and the esquisse. This was the compositional sketch in oils intended to prepare students for the Rome Prize competitions. This sketch was adopted as a preliminary competition for the Rome Prize in 1816, indicating a new officially approved emphasis on the looser, preparatory stages of the painting process, as against previous concentration on the tightly methodical finishing procedures.

The compositional esquisse was broadly and expressively handled. Masses of light, shade and color were laid down to create the design which embodied the artist's first inspired idea for the final painting. Careful finish was not expected for this sketch, in which - on the contrary - spontaneity and originality were the prime qualities sought. The painted sketch was normally preceded by drawn sketches and, if and when the final work was to be executed, the artist followed up the painted esguisse with a series of carefully drawn and painted etudes. These were studies from life of individual elements in the composition, which refined and tightened the original idea. The compositional scheme was then transferred by drawing onto the final canvas, and the slow, meticulous process of executing the finished picture began. Critics of the academic system argued that this laborious process resulted in a sterile and mannered final product. They felt that this meant the artist's original inspiration was inevitably lost because touches of individuality were
eliminated on the smooth surface where individual brushstrokes should not be discernible.

The concept of originality was a major issue much debated in nineteenth century artistic
circles. Conservative traditionalists, on the one hand, associated originality with the elitist idea
of genius, the inventive spark which set one individual apart from the common herd. On the
other hand, a new definition of originality, with its roots in Revolutionary and post-Revolu-
tionary democratic thinking, saw it as an innate characteristic of every human being — the
uniqueness of each separate personality. These opposing definitions reflect the continuation of
the deep division between the intellectual and the manual which had its roots in Renaissance
ideals and aspirations. In terms of artistic practice, the academic notion of genius was embodied in the later stages of finishing a painting, when the artist's mind refined and perfected the first, inspired idea. The newer and more 'democratic' idea of originality held that the artist's uniqueness was most apparent during the preparatory stages, when personal expression and inspiration,
rather than intellect, guided the artist's hand. Thus, by unwittingly creating a program which stressed (at least in terms of time) the preparatory stages of painting — the ebauche and the esquisse in particular - the Academy fortuitously promoted the modern definition of
the idea of originality.

The Independents and new ways of training
It was among the independent artists and movements that the new concept of originality was consciously adopted and striven after, which placed them in opposition to the ideals laid down by the Academy. There were some atelier masters who fostered new methods and original talent, remaining unconvinced that the Academy's program of directing students exclusively towards the Rome Prize was the best way to produce good artists. Among those who offered alternatives were Charles Gleyre (1806-1874) and Thomas Couture (1815- 1879), neither of whom belonged to the Academy. They are therefore referred to as 'independent' artists. Gleyre. whose pupils in the early 1860s included Monet, Renoir, Sisley and Bazille, encouraged his students to make outdoor studies, communicating an admiration for landscape painting, and an appreciation of craftsmanship, which proved especially relevant to Renoir. Couture's most famous pupil was Edouard Manet (1832-1883), who remained with his master from 1850 to 1856, absorbing his unconventional attitudes to light and shade, handling, and immediacy.

Couture encouraged his students to work rapidly and simply to 'keep the first vivid impression'. He often suppressed detail and half- tones in the interests of direct spontaneity. His brushwork was lively, his colors often dragged in thick confident strokes, and his forms, reduced to broad masses, outlined in strong con tours. Couture passed on his love of the Old Masters to Manet, and their friendly association ended only in 1859, when Couture saw that Manet had abandoned the master's commitment to historic guises for his subject matter. Under the influence of writers like the poet Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867), Manet turned to fusing Old Master themes with modern life subjects. That year he exhibited in his studio his rejected Salon entry. The Absinthe Drinker, a modern dress subject which Couture considered lacking in the refining moral overtones of the classical tradition.

Other alternatives for art students sprang up as the century progressed. Around the time of the restoration of the monarchy in 1815. Suisse. an ex-model in David's studio, established an open life studio on the corner of the Quai des Orfevres. There, unfettered by teaching or competitions, artists as diverse as Ingres, Courbet, Manet and Cezanne were to find access to life models, both male and female, to further their own training and interests. The atelier of Rodolphe Julian, which came to be known as the Academy Julian, founded in 1868. became internationally renowned among independent artists. While it did prepare students who wished for the Ecole, Julian's liberal program became for many an alternative to that formal training. Horace Lecoq de Boisbaudran's classes from 1841 to 1869 provided another option for drawing instruction. He invented a method of training by drawing from memory, which encouraged originality in a way unknown in servile copying from the model. His most famous students were the sculptor Auguste
Rodin (1840-1917) and painter and lithographer Henri Fantin-Latour (1836-1904).

Another extremely influential figure in the challenge to the Academy was Eugene Delacroix who was regarded as an independent artist. Delacroix considered himself as a painter who was simply bringing new energy and vitality to a tired classical tradition. However. conservatives criticized him as an innovator. while his works were revered by younger artists for their expressive color and bold brushwork. The visible sign of the brush, which was suppressed by academic 'finish' came to represent for the Impressionist generation the outward mark of the artist's individuality — a personal calligraphy which identified originality and uniqueness. Delacroix founded no school of followers as did Ingres and the academic masters, but his example was important to many younger independent artists, particularly the Impressionists.

Corot was another extremely important independent artist who. although he kept no formal teaching studio, frequently taught and encouraged young artists, including the leading Impressionists Camille Pissarro (1830- 1903) and Berthe Morisot (1841-1895). Corot had trained in the classical landscape tradition, but he abandoned the traditional chiaroscuro way of rendering light and shade in landscape. He was also innovatory and influential in advocating immediacy and the importance of the first impression as evidence of the artist's most genuine personal response to the subject. His maxim was 'Always the masses, the whole, . . . that which strikes you. Never lose the first impression which has moved you.' Significantly. such advice had become common currency by the 1870s, when the Impressionist style was at its height.

New approaches to landscape painting
In nineteenth century France, landscape painting. especially rural landscape, was the type of painting least fettered by the rules of academic tradition. This was the key reason why it became the leading area for the stylistic and technical innovations which reached their peak with Impressionism.

Many older independent artists — like both Delacroix and Corot — did not break completely
with the academic tradition because they continued to maintain the importance of the highly finished work of art. However, they made technical innovations by emphasizing the sketch element in their work. Thus Corot adapted the opaque shadows taught by his neoclassical masters to represent more truthfully the delicate nuances of tonal value he perceived in nature. In his experimental outdoor studies, Corot concentrated on the overall effect of natural light and shade, choosing distant subjects in order that excessive detail should not detract from this general effect. He added white to all his colors to heighten the overall luminosity in his paintings, thus bringing them closer to a faithful rendering of outdoor light effects.By contrast, the conventional academic chiaroscuro technique dictated that. in landscape painting, artists should artificially darken the pale range of tones found in nature and. correspondingly. lighten the pitch of the naturally somber tonal values found indoors, when painting interior scenes.

Academic landscape painting made little direct reference to real light effects in nature. Instead, a classical formula was advocated, which arbitrarily placed darks in the fore ground, with somber theatrical 'wings' of trees or buildings to right and left, the scene growing systematically paler toward a luminous horizon. The lights and darks were a schematized studio invention intended mainly to direct the viewer's eye into the pictorial space. The whole was planned to represent an idea, a human ideal, not real raw nature - indeed the unidealized imitation of nature was condemned as being base and purely mechanical. Whereas in academic figure painting the esquisse was the most freely and spontaneously executed stage, and etudes of individual compositional elements were relatively slowly and carefully worked under static studio lighting conditions, in landscape painting the etude formed the loose stage, in which the artist's response to the natural effect was captured. Speed in the outdoor etude was essential, because of the fast changing, ephemeral lighting effects which had to be translated into paint.

In the academic landscape program, these small etudes from nature provided the raw material and visual vocabulary which aided the artist's memory when the final work was undertaken in the studio. This large-scale piece subjected the initial ideas embodied in the etudes to the classicizing process, in which the classical compositional formula dictated the pictorial structure. This, in turn, dictated the balance and tonal range of light and shade, and most of the original effects were lost in the search for an internal pictorial coherence. An elevating heroic theme, either historical or biblical, was another requirement of academic landscape painting. As accurate observation of particular rural sites in natural outdoor light gained in importance, so artists gradually abandoned studio reworking, preferring more truthful studies executed entirely before nature.

The loss of traditional technical knowledge

Delacroix was one among many nineteenth century artists who held David responsible not simply for the classical revival but, more importantly. for the complete rupture with the tradition of technical expertise. It is true that David discouraged his students from studying and learning from their eighteenth century Rococo predecessors, but the breakdown in traditional painting methods was by then in any case virtually total.

David's affected disdain for technical tradition simply echoed the age-old split between the intellectual and manual aspects of art. The dissolution of traditional practical" know-how had gone hand in hand with the rise of academic training in the seventeenth century. The craft-based guilds had fostered practical expertise, which was handed down by the apprenticeship system from master to pupil. Apprentices had originally to learn all the skills of the trade before they began studying drawing and painting, and thus they were well versed in the chemistry of their materials.

In the early days of the Academies, painting techniques were similarly picked up from the master in whose atelier students worked. However, as the preparation of materials was taken out of the hands of trainees and taken over by professional merchants and specialists, there was no longer a need for this side of the trade to be learned, leaving artists with no practical knowledge of their materials. Nothing was introduced into the students' training to replace this lost knowledge, and awareness of the basic constituents and properties of their tools in-trade was soon lost to artists.

This development is not surprising in view of the attitude of artists to the sordid practicalities which had long linked their profession to that of the common artisan. But not only was the knowledge of materials lost, techniques for handling them survived only to become sterile rules, meaningless and misunderstood by those who used them. Artists' problems were further complicated in the nineteenth century by the introduction of mass-production into the artists' materials trade, which transformed their equipment almost beyond recognition.

Contemporary writers disagreed as to the cause of this technical malaise. Some traditionalists felt inadequate training of the artist was to blame. Color merchants, like the famous English paint chemist George Field, were quick to take this side to defend their profession. He wrote in 1835 that the 'odium of employing bad articles attaches to the artist if he resorts to vicious sources or employ his means improperly'. However, as the French specialist on artist's techniques J. F. L. Merimee had pointed out in 1830, artists "no longer learning the nature of their colors were incompetent to detect fraud or to distinguish the good from the inferior sort.' Many therefore used whatever came to hand and some even preferred the cheapest materials available.

Couture also believed that artists themselves rather than poor materials were to blame for the loss of sound painting. He wrote that it was a great prejudice to think that modern colors were less good than those used by the Old Masters. He naively considered that the best paints were the simplest, like those used by housepainters, and, for this reason, he felt that the excessive care and complicated preparation employed by artists' colormen were detrimental to the resulting colors. For Couture, the solidity of Old Master paintings came not from superior materials, but simply from better painting methods. Renoir (1841-1919) had similar views, which he expressed forcibly on several occasions.

The rise of the color merchant

From about the mid eighteenth century on wards. artists thought that Old Master methods had been lost as a result of jealously guarded professional secrecy among practitioners. This notion derived from the existence of published volumes of Secreti. These were books of assorted chemical and medicinal recipes originating from medieval and later writers. Despite their title, however, these were expressly intended to make knowledge widely available. Thus the traditional recipes and handling techniques had been lost not as a result of any mean tight-fistedness among earlier practitioners but through the changes in structure of artists' training which left them ignorant of such things, and deprived the printed knowledge of its practical meaning. By the time the guilds had been superseded by professional color men, the concern was for profit rather than for durability. Preparation of materials became exclusively the business of traders, who, in the words of Merimee 'had a stronger feeling toward their own immediate profit, than any regard to the preservation of pictures'. This resulted in the deterioration and rapid changes
that took place in many eighteenth century pictures.

From about the early to mid seventeenth century up until the mid eighteenth century the trade in artists' materials was associated with the more general trades of pharmacy and grocery. Although the influential late seventeenth century art theorist Roger de Piles mentioned 'color vendors', it was apparently only after the mid eighteenth century that artists' colormen began appearing as an independent class of trader. Most early color merchants concentrated on the manufacture of a particular commodity — watercolors, varnishes, particular oil colors or pastels, for example, and often bought their raw materials from different manufacturers. However, they all retailed a complete range of items essential to the artist, including supports, frames, brushes.drawing materials, paper, palettes and easels which were ready made by other specialist manufacturers. Thus a particular colorman could be engaged in the specialized production and improvement of one product — like the 'artificial crayons' perfected in the late eighteenth century by Conte — which would then appear amongst the merchandise retailed by other color merchants. Many merchants who began by selling artists' materials soon diversified. moving into picture dealing and restoration by way of renting out engravings and pictures for amateurs to copy. A famous example was the Durand-Ruel family, who began as paper retailers and became the first most loyal and most important dealers in Impressionist paintings. Other firms began as small manufacturers or retailers and expanded into large-scale mass-producers and entre preneurs. supplying their goods to the retail side of the trade.

New techniques
A further disincentive to French artists to pursue more scientifically the bases of their materials and methods, was the ever present association of craft skills with demeaning manual work. This was an especially pertinent stigma at a time when most academic and independent artists were struggling to be accepted into the bourgeois social class. Added to this, craftsman ship in the nineteenth century seems to have become inextricably, though mistakenly, linked in the minds of independent artists, with the laborious finishing procedures of Academic painting. Thus craftsmanship, in the latter third of the nineteenth century, came to be seen by many artists as a restraint upon personal expression and creativity. These were precisely the features held to be so important among independent painters. In his discussion of the need for careful craftsmanship in the build-up of the paint layer, the artist and paint scientist Vibert all but apologized for his concern, keenly emphasizing that it would not inhibit inspiration. Rather it would aid originality by providing a sound technical basis for the enduring expression of the artist's personality.

Vibert recommended alia prima or 'at-a single-sitting' painting as the most durable and safe method, but. as he considered it an ex- tremely difficult technique that few could master, he insisted upon careful underpainting. The methods promoted by academic training were in fact contradictory. On the one hand hasty execution was encouraged because students were pressured by time. However, on the other hand, speed was incompatible with the reworked. multilayered finishing techniques fostered by the Academy, because slow and thorough drying of each successive layer in an oil painting is essential to the work's durability. These successive reworkings resulted in a complex paint layer which was extremely vulnerable because of the increased number of unpredictable chemical reactions involved. The independent rural landscapists, and later the Impressionists, discouraged repeated reworkings by advocating alia prima painting and landscape etudes executed rapidly before nature. This meant that they were simultaneously insisting upon the importance of permanency in their works.

Thus, from the 1850s on, the growing popularity of the rapid, sketch-like alia prima painting technique — which facilitated the recording of natural effects — had clear practical advantages. In addition to its aesthetic attraction in reflecting the artist's originality, it was also more suited to the new, mass-produced materials available. Many independents, like Manet in the 1860s. were to attempt a compromise between old and new methods, trying to fuse traditional elements with the search for immediacy, for the effect of spontaneity in their work. It was as a result of the lively experimentation which dominated artistic activity during this decade, that the obsolete chiaroscuro techniques were finally superseded by the novel techniques of Impressionism.



Copyright 2006 © CitiMall Shopping Mall. All rights reserved. Entertainment Book - VIN Number - Free VIN Check - Kelley Blue Book - Car Insurance - Car Warranty - Used Car History - NADA - Legal

Shopping Mall : Art Gallery, Fine Art Collection, Art History, Art Supply & Art Print

ART Category: Art, Arts, Fantasy Art, Wildlife Art, Art Gallery, Fine Art, Art History, Art Print, Digital Art, Art Supply, African Art, 3d Art, Poster Art, Cartoon Art, Nude Art, Art Wall, Religious Art

Shopping Mall: Art Store offers Arts, Fantasy Art, Wildlife Art, Art Gallery, Fine Art, Art History, Art Print, Digital Art, Art Supply, African Art, 3d Art, Poster Art, Cartoon Art, Nude Art, Art Wall, Religious Art

ART Topics: Art, Arts, Fantasy Art, Wildlife Art, Art Gallery, Fine Art, Art History, Art Print, Digital Art, Art Supply, African Art, 3d Art, Poster Art, Cartoon Art, Nude Art, Art Wall, Religious Art